법원의 Brayton Purcell LLP: 재판 평결
Brayton Purcell LLP 변호사는 매일 법정에서 고객을 위해 일하고 있습니다. 우리는 탄탄한 재판 승리와 경험이 부상 피해자, 노인 및 소비자에게 최고의 대리권을 제공하는 데 도움이 된다고 굳게 믿습니다.
다음은 당사의 재판 법원 사건 중 일부를 요약한 것입니다. 또한 연도별 더 자세한 판결 목록에 액세스할 수도 있습니다.
You may also click on these selected attorney links to see their respective court result pages: Gilbert Purcell, James Nevin and Jason Rose.
We also have championed a wide variety of issues in appellate courts.
$24,260,000.00 은퇴한 81세 부두 노동자에 대한 판결
6주간의 재판과 1일도 채 안 된 심의 끝에 샌프란시스코 배심원단은 조선소 계약자인 피고 Triple A Machine Shop, Inc.를 상대로 81세의 원고 George Lucas에게 유리한 평결을 내려 다음과 같이 결정했습니다. 피고인 Triple A의 과실로 인해 Lucas씨의 중피종이 발생했다고 주장합니다.(George Lucas v. Triple A Machine Shop, Inc., 2017 Case No. ##XX#####, San Francisco County Superior Court)$5 Million Verdict for Retired Pipefitter in Mesothelioma Trial
After a three week trial and two days of deliberations, a Multnomah County jury returned a verdict against John Crane Inc. The jury assessed $1.93 million in total non-economic damages and $813,853 in economic damages. The jury also found that the defendant corporation showed a reckless and outrageous indifference to a highly unreasonable risk of harm and assessed $3 million dollars in punitive damages. ( Robert and Bonnie Sprague v. John Crane Inc. , 2017 Case No. 15CV14771, Multnomah County Circuit Court)$13,227,939 Verdict for Retired San Francisco Electrician
A San Francisco jury found Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., a manufacturer of joint compounds, guilty of acting with oppression or malice by clear and convincing evidence and levied a $6,000,000 punitive damages verdict against defendant Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. ( Melvin Desin v. Defendant Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. , 2012 Case No. 275881, San Francisco Superior Court)캘리포니아주 샌프란시스코에서 은퇴한 지역 38번 배관공에 대한 $41,273,421의 판결
샌프란시스코 배심원단은 만장일치로 조인트 컴파운드 및 벽판 재료 제조업체인 Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc.가 명확하고 설득력 있는 증거를 통해 억압이나 악의를 가지고 행동한 혐의로 유죄를 선고했습니다. (John Casey 및 Patricia Casey v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. 등, 2011년 사건 번호 CGC–10–275517, 샌프란시스코 고등법원)Jury Renders $5.2 Million Verdict in Utah Peritoneal Mesothelioma Case
A jury in Salt Lake City, Utah found in favor of Vickie Warren, suffering from a rare case of peritoneal mesothelioma, in her products liability design defect and products liability failure to warn trial against Georgia–Pacific, LLP, Hamilton Materials, Inc., and Union Carbide Corporation. The asbestos products manufactured by the defendants were found to be the cause of her peritoneal mesothelioma. ( Vickie Warren v. Georgia Pacific; Hamilton Materials and Union Carbide Corporation , 2010 Case No. 070911933, Salt Lake City Third Judicial District Court)Jury Assesses a $10.2 Million Verdict for Retired Washington Paper Mill Worker Suffering from Mesothelioma
Jury Assesses a $10.2 Million Verdict for Retired Washington Paper Mill Worker Suffering from Mesothelioma
A federal jury in Seattle, Washington found in favor of Henry Barabin, a retired Crown Zellerbach Paper Mill worker suffering from mesothelioma, and his wife, Geraldine, in their products liability case against Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. and AstenJohnson Inc., two former manufacturers of asbestos–containing dryer fabrics used on paper machines. ( Henry Barabin, et al. v.Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. & AstenJohnson, Inc. , 2009 Case No. C07-01454-RSL, United States District Court, Western District of Washington) Rather than pay the judgment, the defendants appealed. Mr. Barabin managed to beat the odds and bravely fought his mesothelioma for a long time before […]Jury Assesses a $3.4 Million Verdict for the Family of a Former Johns–Manville Plant Worker
A jury ruled in favor of the family of Richard Worthley Sr., a deceased former Johns–Manville Transite plant worker from Beaumont, California, in their negligence, products liability design defect, and products liability failure to warn trial against Advocate Mines Limited, an asbestos mine in Baie Verte, Newfoundland. ( Mickie Worthley, et al. v. Advocate Mines Limited, et. al. , 2009 Case No. 432308, San Francisco Superior Court)San Francisco Jury Renders a $8.4 Million Dollar Verdict for Former Drywaller with Mesothelioma
A jury ruled in favor of Jack Reynolds, a former drywaller from Rio Vista, California, in his products liability trial against Hamilton Materials, Inc., assessing $8.4 million in damages, due to Hamilton Materials, Inc.’s contribution in causing Mr. Reynolds’ mesothelioma. ( Jack Reynolds v. Hamilton Materials, Inc. , 2009 Case No. 274747, San Francisco Superior Court)Jury Assesses a $1,185,500 Verdict for Oakland, California Laborer
A jury ruled in favor of Charles Johnson, a former laborer from Oakland, California, in his negligence trial against Plant Insulation Company, assessing $1,185,500, due to Plant Insulation Company’s contribution in causing Mr. Johnson’s mesothelioma. ( Charles Johnson v. Plant Insulation Company, et al. , 2009 Case No. 274919, San Francisco Superior Court)San Francisco Jury finds Manufacturer Foster Wheeler LLC Negligent in Navy Veteran’s Development of Mesothelioma
San Francisco Jury finds Manufacturer Foster Wheeler LLC Negligent in Navy Veteran’s Development of Mesothelioma
A jury awarded $2,039,519 in total damages to the family of Calvin Oxford, a former Navy boiler tender who developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure during his Navy service in the 1960s. ( Judy Oxford, et al. vs. Foster Wheeler Corporation, et al. , 2008 No. 440328, San Francisco Superior Court)중피종으로 고통받는 항공우주 플라스틱 성형업체에 대해 1,850만 달러 이상의 판결
A jury ruled in favor of a former plastics molder suffering from mesothelioma, assessing over $18.5 million in damages against a former asbestos mining and manufacturing company. ( David Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation , 2006 Case No. 445300, San Francisco Superior Court, California)San Francisco Jury Finds Chrysotile Asbestos Causes Rare Peritoneal Mesothelioma
A jury awarded over $1.9 million to a 71–year–old retired sheet metal worker, Genaro Garcia, who developed peritoneal mesothelioma from his prior on–the–job exposure to asbestos. ( Genaro Garcia and Delia Garcia v. Duro Dyne Corporation and Holmes & Narver, Inc. , 2005, Case No. 418098, San Francisco Superior Court, California)San Francisco Jury Awards $8,673,704 in Mesothelioma Case
A San Francisco jury awarded $8,673,704.74 to a 60 year old former United States Navy machinist and engineering officer suffering from terminal pleural mesothelioma caused by his service–related exposure to asbestos. ( Anthony Cadlo and Maxlyn Cadlo vs. John Crane Inc. and Metalclad Insulation Corp. , 2005, Case No. 412325, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Jury Awards Over $2.9 Million to Electrician with Mesothelioma
A San Francisco jury awarded $2,999,543 to a 74–year old retired electrician who is terminally ill with pleural mesothelioma caused by occupational asbestos exposure. He worked with asbestos–containing phenolic plastic compounds and asbestos–containing parts on electrical equipment. ( Philip Hoeffer v. Rockwell Automation , 2003, Case No. 28817, San Francisco Superior Court, California)샌프란시스코 배심원단, 전 해군 전기공에게 3370만 달러 수여
In what is believed to be the largest verdict ever in a California asbestos case, a San Francisco jury awarded a total of $33.7 million to a navy electrician and his wife. Mr. Todak, who suffers from mesothelioma, was awarded $22.7 million and his wife received $11 million for loss of consortium. ( Alfred Todak v. Foster Wheeler L.L.C. , 2002, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Jury Awards Over $8 Million to Insulator
A jury returned a verdict of $8 million in favor of an insulator who contracted mesothelioma from work around boilers at a refinery. ( Alan Vasen v. Exxon Mobil Corporation , 2001, Case No. 312211, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Los Angeles Jury Awards Over $4.4 Million to Dying Steamfitter
A steamfitter diagnosed with mesothelioma received over $4.4 million in damages. The defendant, John Crane, Inc., manufactured asbestos pump and valve packing and gaskets that the steamfitter used at a power plant during the 1950’s and 1960’s. ( James and Rose Efstratios v. John Crane, Inc. , 2001, Case No. BC226519, Los Angeles Superior Court, California)배심원단, 퇴역한 해군 대위의 미망인에게 담배 폐암 사건으로 1,770만 달러 지급 판결
A jury unanimously agreed to award $17,736,700 to the widow of Captain William Major, U.S. Navy, Retired, against the only defendant in the case, Lorillard Tobacco Co. the jury concluded that products made by Lorillard Tobacco Co. failed to meet the California consumer safety based risk-benefit test for design defect.배심원단은 은퇴한 지역 396 철공 노동자의 가족에게 석면 폐암 사례로 260만 달러를 수여했습니다.
배심원은 은퇴한 Local 378 철공인 Douglas “Duke” Vanden Broek의 가족에게 2,610,720달러를 지급했으며, 여러 장소의 절연체에 사용된 석면에 노출되었습니다. (Anne Vanden Broek 등 v. Plant Insulation Company, 2008년 사건 번호 436690, 샌프란시스코 고등법원)석면 폐암 기계공에게 500만 달러 이상의 보상금 지급
An asbestos lung cancer victim who was employed as a Navy machinist and engineering officer was awarded over $5 million by a San Francisco jury. He had worked with asbestos gaskets and steam packing as well as with asbestos–containing marine valves during his career. ( Edward Jones v. John Crane Incorporated, et al, 2003, San Francisco Superior Court, California)석면 관련 폐질환 피해자에 대한 대규모 오레곤 판결
A jury awarded over $1.5 million in favor of a 71–year old Portland worker diagnosed with asbestos–related lung disease and non–Hodgkin’s lymphoma. He had been exposed to asbestos–containing building products manufactured by Kaiser Gypsum. ( Robert Bush v. Kaiser Gypsum, 1999, Case No. 03–01863, Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon)샌프란시스코 심사위원단은 석면암 사건에서 1,083,000달러를 수상했습니다.
A jury awarded $1,083,000 to Merle Sandy, a 60–year–old retired pipefitter suffering from asbestos pleural disease, asbestosis and colon cancer caused by his on–the–job exposure to asbestos. ( Merle Sandy v. Exxon Mobil Corporation , 2006, Case No. 324212, San Francisco Superior Court, California)샌프란시스코 배심원단, 대장암 석면 재판에서 340만 달러 판결
A San Francisco jury delivered a plaintiff’s verdict of over $3.4 million for Ralph Pierce, a 70–year old retired machine operator and supervisor suffering from colon cancer from his on–the–job exposure to asbestos products. ( Ralph Pierce v. Certainteed Corporation. , 2005, Case No. 408642, San Francisco Superior Court, California)워싱턴주 석면 사건에서 결장암/림프종 피해자가 만연
A millwright who was exposed to asbestos–containing insulation at his job site contracted non–Hodgkin’s lymphoma and colon cancer. A Seattle jury returned a verdict of over $1.5 million against a leading pipe and boiler insulation contractor. ( Ray Sundberg v. ACandS, Inc. et al., 2001, Case No. 21756–0, King County Superior Court, Oregon)Former Navy Boiler Maker with Asbestosis Assessed Verdict Against Asbestos Corporation Ltd.
A San Francisco jury ruled in favor of Tommy Dye, a former Navy boiler maker from Othello, Washington, in his products liability case against Asbestos Corporation Limited (ACL), a supplier of asbestos fibers used in the manufacture of packing, gasket, and insulation materials. ( Tommy Dye, et al. v. Asbestos Corporation Limited, et al. , 2009 Case No. 274606, San Francisco Superior Court)건식 벽체 테이퍼 제품군에 대한 $868,000 이상의 석면 평결
A jury returned a verdict of over $868,000 in favor of the family of a drywall taper who died of asbestosis and asbestos pleural disease. ( Aline Ivance, Vicky Woolley, and Lindy Schluter v. Rich–Tex, Inc. , 2007 Case No. 419435, San Francisco Superior Court, California)샌프란시스코 배심원단 석면 사건에서 1,150만 달러 이상 수상
A jury awarded over $1.1 million to a Navy veteran suffering from asbestosis and $400,000 to his wife for the loss of his companionship. The defendant, Asbestos Corporation Limited, acted with malice or oppression, according to the jury, which added another $10 million in punitive damages against the company. ( Joseph Garza and Mary Garza v. Asbestos Corporation Limited , 2006 Case No. 438144, San Francisco Superior Court, California)심사위원단은 말기 석면증에 대해 280만 달러를 지급했습니다.
A San Francisco jury awarded Harold Phelps and his wife Neva $2.8 million in damages because of occupational exposure to asbestos. ( Harold Phelps v. Hamilton Materials, Inc. , 2005, Case No. 433734, San Francisco Superior Court, California)시애틀 배심원단, 석면폐 사건에서 $242,500의 원고 평결 전달
A Seattle jury awarded $242,500 to a paper mill worker suffering from asbestosis due to his exposure to asbestos in dryer felts. ( Ernest Coulter and Lerose Coulter v. ACandS, Inc. et al. , 2005, Case No. 01–2–34675–0SEA, King County Superior Court, WA)샌프란시스코 배심원단, 석면폐증 사건에서 $1,250,000 수상
A San Francisco jury unanimously awarded damages of $1,250,000 in favor of a retired pipefitter with asbestosis and pleural disease caused by his occupational exposure to asbestos. ( Geronia Quarles vs. Advocate Mines, Ltd. , 2005, Case No. 409170, San Francisco Superior Court, California)심사위원단은 석면증 엔지니어에게 110만 달러 이상의 상을 수여했습니다.
A San Francisco jury awarded over $1.1 million to a stationary engineer suffering from asbestosis due to his exposure to asbestos. For 35 years, his job included maintaining laundry equipment. He replaced asbestos–containing binders, pads, and covers––items manufactured by the defendants. ( Asbestos Plaintiff v. American Laundry Machinery, Inc. , 2003, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Brayton Purcell LLP, Center for Claims Resolution에 대한 고객 평결 승리
The Center for Claims Resolution (CCR), a settlement organization comprised of former manufacturers of asbestos products, should not have sent the plaintiffs in asbestos cases checks for amounts that were less than what was agreed to in the original settlements. CCR had claimed that it was not liable for the shortages because they were due to the financial problems of its member companies. ( In re: Complex Asbestos Litigation: Patricia Anderegg, et al. v. Center for Claims Resolution , 2003, Case No. 828684, San Francisco Superior Court, California)자동차 상해 평결은 유타주에서 가장 큰 개인 상해 보상입니다
A Salt Lake City jury awarded $16.4 million to an 11 1/2 year old boy who suffered a traumatic brain injury that he received in a head–on automobile crash. ( Anthony Gallegos et al. v. Dick Simon Trucking, Inc. , 2001, Utah District Court, Salt Lake City, Utah)부적절한 통증 관리는 노인 학대였습니다
In the first successful elder abuse case of its kind, a jury awarded $1.5 million to the family of a deceased man whose doctor had failed to provide him with adequate pain medication in the last days of his terminal cancer. ( Beverly Bergman et al. v. Wing Chin, M.D., Eden Medical Center, 2001, Case No. H205732–1, Alameda Superior Court, California)베릴륨 노출에 대한 보상을 받은 세라믹 엔지니어
A 37–year old ceramics engineer who was suffering from chronic beryllium disease obtained a $1.9 million jury verdict against the landlord of the facility where he was exposed to beryllium. ( Donald Polensky, et al. v. Kyocera International, 1993, Case No. 63–80–30, Orange County Superior Court, California)배심원단, 사산아의 화장된 유골 혼합에 대해 $750,000 이상 평결 반환
An Ohio jury returned a verdict of over $750,000 in favor of a young couple whose stillborn son’s cremated remains were mixed with those of an adult. ( Tonya Leach and Edward Squire v. E.F. Boyd & Son Funeral Home et al. , 2006, Case No. CV 04 546335, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Ohio)장례식장, 화장 부주의로 손해배상 배상
A jury assessed $1 million in total damages, the majority being punitive damages, for the funeral home’s inexplicable loss of the cremated remains of Mrs. Conway’s 90–year old husband. ( May L. Conway v. Gates, Kingsey & Gates, 1992, Case No. WEC 113827, Los Angeles Superior Court, California) Disclaimer: Past results provided on this website do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Results portrayed on this website were dependent on facts of individual cases. Results of your own case will vary depending on the factual and legal circumstances of your situation.
