아래는 2004년부터 시행한 시험을 요약한 것입니다.
오레곤 배심원단, 중피종 사건에서 $659,000 이상 평가
배심원단은 암 중피종을 앓고 있는 바닥 설치 작업자가 작업 중 석면 노출로 인해 $659,000 이상을 받을 자격이 있다고 결정했습니다.
( Morris Nagl 및 Donna Nagl 대 Dowman Products Inc. , 2004, 사건 번호 02-04-04227, Oregon 순회 법원, Multnomah 카운티)
지역 가족이 9.11 희생자 구호 기금에서 지급금을 받음
캘리포니아 노바토의 한 가족은 9.11 피해자 구호 기금에서 200만 달러 이상의 보상금을 받았습니다. Brayton Purcell LLP는 Trial Lawyers Care(TLC) 프로그램의 일부인 무료 노력으로 가족을 대표했습니다. TLC는 9월 11일 희생자들에게 법률 서비스를 제공하는 자원봉사 재판 변호사들의 비영리 법인입니다.
( 특별 마스터에 대한 벤치 재판 , 2004, Department of Justice, New York City, New York)
선택된 평결: 2004
Donald Perman v. Duro Dyne Corporation, et al.
Civil Jury Trial
Superior Court: San Francisco County, California
Judge: Hon. James McBride
Trial Type: Products Liability-Negligence
Case Resolved During Jury Selection: Excess of $1,250,000
November – December 2004
In Re Group 282 v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al.
Consolidated Civil Jury Trial
Superior Court: San Francisco County, California
Judge: Hon. Donald Mitchell
Trial Type: Premises Liability-Negligence
Cases Resolved During Jury Selection: Excess of $350,000
October 2004
Thomas McClure v. Fluor Corporation, et al.
Civil Jury Trial
Superior Court: San Francisco County, California
Judge: Hon. James Robertson II
Trial Type: Products Liability-Premises Liability-Negligence
Case Resolved During Jury Selection: Excess of $650,000
August – September 2004
Anne Mader v. Owens Illinois Company, et al.
Civil Jury Trial
Superior Court: San Francisco County, California
Judge: Hon. James McBride
Trial Type: Products Liability-Negligence
Case Resolved at Beginning of Voir Dire: Excess of $250,000
August 2004
Stanley Ives v. Hamilton Building Materials Company, et al.
Civil Jury Trial
Superior Court: San Francisco County, California
Judge: Hon. David Ballati
Trial Type: Products Liability-Negligence
Case Resolved After Jury Selection: Excess of $700,000
August 2004
David Davis v. Kelly Moore Paint Company, et al.
Civil Jury Trial
Superior Court: San Francisco County, California
Judge: Hon. David Ballati
Trial Type: Products Liability-Negligence
Case Resolved After Opening Statements: Excess of $550,000
July 2004
Richard Reynolds v. Hill Brothers Chemical Company
Civil Jury Trial
Superior Court: San Francisco County, California
Judge: Hon. Tomar Mason
Trial Type: Product Liability-Negligence
Case Resolved During Jury Selection: Excess of $750,000
July 2004
Harlan Ketchum v. Union Carbide Corporation
Civil Jury Trial
Superior Court: San Francisco County, California
Judge: Hon. Peter Busch
Trial Type: Product Liability-Negligence-Mesothelioma
Verdict: Case Resolved During Jury Selection: Excess of $3,600,000
June – July 2004
Morris Nagl and Donna Nagl v. Dowman Products Inc.
Civil Jury Trial
Circuit Court: Multnomah County, Oregon
Judge: Hon. John A. Wittmayer
Trial Type: Products Liability-Negligence-Mesothelioma
Verdict: $659,720.87
May – June 2004
In Re Department of Justice – September 11 Victim Relief Fund
Bench Trial to Special Master
Department of Justice: New York City, New York
Judge: Special Master Kenneth Feinberg
Trial Type: Victim Compensation Fund-Congressional Mandate
Judgment: Claimant Family Awarded $2,083,000
May 2004
Robert Ryan v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd.
Civil Jury Trial
Superior Court: San Francisco County, California
Judge: Hon. John E. Munter
Trial Type: Products Liability-Disputed Mesothelioma
Verdict: Defense on Medical Diagnosis
Case Resolved with Remaining Defendants: Excess of $500,000
March 2004
John Kiss v. Asbestos Defendants, et al.
Civil Jury Trial
Superior Court: San Francisco County, California
Judge: Hon. Charlene Padovani Mitchell
Trial Type: Products Liability-Negligence-Colon Cancer
Verdict: Case Resolved at Opening Statements: Excess of $1,500,000
February – March 2004
