Brayton Purcell LLP nos tribunais: veredictos do julgamento
Os advogados da Brayton Purcell LLP estão no tribunal todos os dias trabalhando para seus clientes. Acreditamos firmemente que um histórico sólido de vitórias e experiências em julgamentos nos ajuda a fornecer a melhor representação para vítimas de lesões, idosos e consumidores.
Abaixo estão resumos de apenas alguns de nossos casos em tribunais de primeira instância. Você também pode acessar listas mais detalhadas de veredictos por ano à direita.
You may also click on these selected attorney links to see their respective court result pages: Gilbert Purcell, James Nevin and Jason Rose.
We also have championed a wide variety of issues in appellate courts.
Veredicto de $ 24.260.000,00 para estivador aposentado de 81 anos
Após um julgamento de seis (6) semanas e menos de um (1) dia de deliberações, um júri de São Francisco avaliou um veredicto a favor do demandante George Lucas, de 81 anos, contra o réu Triple A Machine Shop, Inc., um empreiteiro de estaleiro, decidindo aquele réu Triple A foi negligente e contribuiu para causar o mesotelioma do Sr. Lucas. (George Lucas v. Triple A Machine Shop, Inc., 2017 Caso No. ##XX######, Tribunal Superior do Condado de São Francisco)$5 Million Verdict for Retired Pipefitter in Mesothelioma Trial
After a three week trial and two days of deliberations, a Multnomah County jury returned a verdict against John Crane Inc. The jury assessed $1.93 million in total non-economic damages and $813,853 in economic damages. The jury also found that the defendant corporation showed a reckless and outrageous indifference to a highly unreasonable risk of harm and assessed $3 million dollars in punitive damages. ( Robert and Bonnie Sprague v. John Crane Inc. , 2017 Case No. 15CV14771, Multnomah County Circuit Court)Veredicto de US$ 70.861.113 para maquinista aposentado e inspetor nuclear
Após um julgamento de seis semanas e um dia de deliberações, um júri do condado de Alameda avaliou um veredicto de mais de US$ 70 milhões contra a John Crane Inc., uma fabricante de gaxetas e juntas de amianto. (Robert & Linda Whalen v. John Crane Inc., 2014, Caso nº RG14711964, Tribunal Superior do Condado de Alameda)$13,227,939 Verdict for Retired San Francisco Electrician
A San Francisco jury found Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., a manufacturer of joint compounds, guilty of acting with oppression or malice by clear and convincing evidence and levied a $6,000,000 punitive damages verdict against defendant Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. ( Melvin Desin v. Defendant Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. , 2012 Case No. 275881, San Francisco Superior Court)Veredicto de $ 1.979.228 para pedreiro aposentado de Los Angeles
Um júri de Los Angeles decidiu contra a Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., fabricante de compostos para juntas contendo amianto, decidindo que seus compostos foram projetados de maneira defeituosa e continham uma falha em alertar sobre defeitos do produto. (Vincent Monaco v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., 2012 Caso No. BC473091, Tribunal Superior de Los Angeles)Veredicto de $ 41.273.421 para encanador local nº 38 aposentado em São Francisco, Califórnia
Um júri unânime de São Francisco considerou a Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., fabricante de compostos para juntas e materiais para painéis de parede, culpada de agir com opressão ou malícia por meio de evidências claras e convincentes. (John Casey e Patricia Casey v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., et al., 2011 Caso No. CGC–10–275517, Tribunal Superior de São Francisco)Jury Renders $5.2 Million Verdict in Utah Peritoneal Mesothelioma Case
A jury in Salt Lake City, Utah found in favor of Vickie Warren, suffering from a rare case of peritoneal mesothelioma, in her products liability design defect and products liability failure to warn trial against Georgia–Pacific, LLP, Hamilton Materials, Inc., and Union Carbide Corporation. The asbestos products manufactured by the defendants were found to be the cause of her peritoneal mesothelioma. ( Vickie Warren v. Georgia Pacific; Hamilton Materials and Union Carbide Corporation , 2010 Case No. 070911933, Salt Lake City Third Judicial District Court)Jury Assesses a $10.2 Million Verdict for Retired Washington Paper Mill Worker Suffering from Mesothelioma
Jury Assesses a $10.2 Million Verdict for Retired Washington Paper Mill Worker Suffering from Mesothelioma
A federal jury in Seattle, Washington found in favor of Henry Barabin, a retired Crown Zellerbach Paper Mill worker suffering from mesothelioma, and his wife, Geraldine, in their products liability case against Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. and AstenJohnson Inc., two former manufacturers of asbestos–containing dryer fabrics used on paper machines. ( Henry Barabin, et al. v.Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. & AstenJohnson, Inc. , 2009 Case No. C07-01454-RSL, United States District Court, Western District of Washington) Rather than pay the judgment, the defendants appealed. Mr. Barabin managed to beat the odds and bravely fought his mesothelioma for a long time before […]Jury Assesses a $3.4 Million Verdict for the Family of a Former Johns–Manville Plant Worker
A jury ruled in favor of the family of Richard Worthley Sr., a deceased former Johns–Manville Transite plant worker from Beaumont, California, in their negligence, products liability design defect, and products liability failure to warn trial against Advocate Mines Limited, an asbestos mine in Baie Verte, Newfoundland. ( Mickie Worthley, et al. v. Advocate Mines Limited, et. al. , 2009 Case No. 432308, San Francisco Superior Court)San Francisco Jury Renders a $8.4 Million Dollar Verdict for Former Drywaller with Mesothelioma
A jury ruled in favor of Jack Reynolds, a former drywaller from Rio Vista, California, in his products liability trial against Hamilton Materials, Inc., assessing $8.4 million in damages, due to Hamilton Materials, Inc.’s contribution in causing Mr. Reynolds’ mesothelioma. ( Jack Reynolds v. Hamilton Materials, Inc. , 2009 Case No. 274747, San Francisco Superior Court)Jury Assesses a $1,185,500 Verdict for Oakland, California Laborer
A jury ruled in favor of Charles Johnson, a former laborer from Oakland, California, in his negligence trial against Plant Insulation Company, assessing $1,185,500, due to Plant Insulation Company’s contribution in causing Mr. Johnson’s mesothelioma. ( Charles Johnson v. Plant Insulation Company, et al. , 2009 Case No. 274919, San Francisco Superior Court)San Francisco Jury finds Manufacturer Foster Wheeler LLC Negligent in Navy Veteran’s Development of Mesothelioma
San Francisco Jury finds Manufacturer Foster Wheeler LLC Negligent in Navy Veteran’s Development of Mesothelioma
A jury awarded $2,039,519 in total damages to the family of Calvin Oxford, a former Navy boiler tender who developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure during his Navy service in the 1960s. ( Judy Oxford, et al. vs. Foster Wheeler Corporation, et al. , 2008 No. 440328, San Francisco Superior Court)Veredicto de mais de $ 18,5 milhões para moldador de plásticos aeroespaciais que sofre de mesotelioma
Veredicto de mais de $ 18,5 milhões para moldador de plásticos aeroespaciais que sofre de mesotelioma
A jury ruled in favor of a former plastics molder suffering from mesothelioma, assessing over $18.5 million in damages against a former asbestos mining and manufacturing company. ( David Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation , 2006 Case No. 445300, San Francisco Superior Court, California)San Francisco Jury Finds Chrysotile Asbestos Causes Rare Peritoneal Mesothelioma
A jury awarded over $1.9 million to a 71–year–old retired sheet metal worker, Genaro Garcia, who developed peritoneal mesothelioma from his prior on–the–job exposure to asbestos. ( Genaro Garcia and Delia Garcia v. Duro Dyne Corporation and Holmes & Narver, Inc. , 2005, Case No. 418098, San Francisco Superior Court, California)San Francisco Jury Awards $8,673,704 in Mesothelioma Case
A San Francisco jury awarded $8,673,704.74 to a 60 year old former United States Navy machinist and engineering officer suffering from terminal pleural mesothelioma caused by his service–related exposure to asbestos. ( Anthony Cadlo and Maxlyn Cadlo vs. John Crane Inc. and Metalclad Insulation Corp. , 2005, Case No. 412325, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Jury Awards Over $2.9 Million to Electrician with Mesothelioma
A San Francisco jury awarded $2,999,543 to a 74–year old retired electrician who is terminally ill with pleural mesothelioma caused by occupational asbestos exposure. He worked with asbestos–containing phenolic plastic compounds and asbestos–containing parts on electrical equipment. ( Philip Hoeffer v. Rockwell Automation , 2003, Case No. 28817, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Júri de São Francisco concede US$ 33,7 milhões a ex-eletricista da Marinha
In what is believed to be the largest verdict ever in a California asbestos case, a San Francisco jury awarded a total of $33.7 million to a navy electrician and his wife. Mr. Todak, who suffers from mesothelioma, was awarded $22.7 million and his wife received $11 million for loss of consortium. ( Alfred Todak v. Foster Wheeler L.L.C. , 2002, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Jury Awards Over $8 Million to Insulator
A jury returned a verdict of $8 million in favor of an insulator who contracted mesothelioma from work around boilers at a refinery. ( Alan Vasen v. Exxon Mobil Corporation , 2001, Case No. 312211, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Los Angeles Jury Awards Over $4.4 Million to Dying Steamfitter
A steamfitter diagnosed with mesothelioma received over $4.4 million in damages. The defendant, John Crane, Inc., manufactured asbestos pump and valve packing and gaskets that the steamfitter used at a power plant during the 1950’s and 1960’s. ( James and Rose Efstratios v. John Crane, Inc. , 2001, Case No. BC226519, Los Angeles Superior Court, California)Júri concede US$ 17,7 milhões em caso de câncer de pulmão de tabaco à viúva de capitão aposentado da Marinha
Júri concede US$ 17,7 milhões em caso de câncer de pulmão de tabaco à viúva de capitão aposentado da Marinha
A jury unanimously agreed to award $17,736,700 to the widow of Captain William Major, U.S. Navy, Retired, against the only defendant in the case, Lorillard Tobacco Co. the jury concluded that products made by Lorillard Tobacco Co. failed to meet the California consumer safety based risk-benefit test for design defect.Júri concede $ 2,6 milhões em caso de câncer de pulmão de amianto para família de trabalhador de ferro local 396 aposentado
Júri concede $ 2,6 milhões em caso de câncer de pulmão de amianto para família de trabalhador de ferro local 396 aposentado
Um júri concedeu US$ 2.610.720 à família de Douglas “Duke” Vanden Broek, um ferreiro local 378 aposentado, e foi exposto ao amianto usado por isoladores em vários locais. (Anne Vanden Broek, et al. v. Plant Insulation Company, Processo nº 436690 de 2008, Tribunal Superior de San Francisco)Maquinista com câncer de pulmão devido a amianto recebe mais de US$ 5 milhões
An asbestos lung cancer victim who was employed as a Navy machinist and engineering officer was awarded over $5 million by a San Francisco jury. He had worked with asbestos gaskets and steam packing as well as with asbestos–containing marine valves during his career. ( Edward Jones v. John Crane Incorporated, et al, 2003, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Grande veredicto de Oregon para vítima de doença pulmonar relacionada ao amianto
A jury awarded over $1.5 million in favor of a 71–year old Portland worker diagnosed with asbestos–related lung disease and non–Hodgkin’s lymphoma. He had been exposed to asbestos–containing building products manufactured by Kaiser Gypsum. ( Robert Bush v. Kaiser Gypsum, 1999, Case No. 03–01863, Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon)Júri de São Francisco concede US$ 1.083.000 em caso de câncer por amianto
A jury awarded $1,083,000 to Merle Sandy, a 60–year–old retired pipefitter suffering from asbestos pleural disease, asbestosis and colon cancer caused by his on–the–job exposure to asbestos. ( Merle Sandy v. Exxon Mobil Corporation , 2006, Case No. 324212, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Júri de São Francisco dá veredicto de US$ 3,4 milhões em julgamento de amianto contra câncer de cólon
Júri de São Francisco dá veredicto de US$ 3,4 milhões em julgamento de amianto contra câncer de cólon
A San Francisco jury delivered a plaintiff’s verdict of over $3.4 million for Ralph Pierce, a 70–year old retired machine operator and supervisor suffering from colon cancer from his on–the–job exposure to asbestos products. ( Ralph Pierce v. Certainteed Corporation. , 2005, Case No. 408642, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Vítima de câncer de cólon/linfoma prevalece no caso de amianto em Washington
A millwright who was exposed to asbestos–containing insulation at his job site contracted non–Hodgkin’s lymphoma and colon cancer. A Seattle jury returned a verdict of over $1.5 million against a leading pipe and boiler insulation contractor. ( Ray Sundberg v. ACandS, Inc. et al., 2001, Case No. 21756–0, King County Superior Court, Oregon)Former Navy Boiler Maker with Asbestosis Assessed Verdict Against Asbestos Corporation Ltd.
A San Francisco jury ruled in favor of Tommy Dye, a former Navy boiler maker from Othello, Washington, in his products liability case against Asbestos Corporation Limited (ACL), a supplier of asbestos fibers used in the manufacture of packing, gasket, and insulation materials. ( Tommy Dye, et al. v. Asbestos Corporation Limited, et al. , 2009 Case No. 274606, San Francisco Superior Court)Veredicto de amianto de mais de US$ 868.000 para família de drywall Taper
A jury returned a verdict of over $868,000 in favor of the family of a drywall taper who died of asbestosis and asbestos pleural disease. ( Aline Ivance, Vicky Woolley, and Lindy Schluter v. Rich–Tex, Inc. , 2007 Case No. 419435, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Júri de São Francisco concede mais de US$ 11,5 milhões em caso de amianto
A jury awarded over $1.1 million to a Navy veteran suffering from asbestosis and $400,000 to his wife for the loss of his companionship. The defendant, Asbestos Corporation Limited, acted with malice or oppression, according to the jury, which added another $10 million in punitive damages against the company. ( Joseph Garza and Mary Garza v. Asbestos Corporation Limited , 2006 Case No. 438144, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Júri concede US$ 2,8 milhões para asbestose terminal
A San Francisco jury awarded Harold Phelps and his wife Neva $2.8 million in damages because of occupational exposure to asbestos. ( Harold Phelps v. Hamilton Materials, Inc. , 2005, Case No. 433734, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Júri de Seattle entrega veredicto de US$ 242.500 em caso de asbestose
A Seattle jury awarded $242,500 to a paper mill worker suffering from asbestosis due to his exposure to asbestos in dryer felts. ( Ernest Coulter and Lerose Coulter v. ACandS, Inc. et al. , 2005, Case No. 01–2–34675–0SEA, King County Superior Court, WA)Júri de São Francisco concede $ 1.250.000 em caso de asbestose
A San Francisco jury unanimously awarded damages of $1,250,000 in favor of a retired pipefitter with asbestosis and pleural disease caused by his occupational exposure to asbestos. ( Geronia Quarles vs. Advocate Mines, Ltd. , 2005, Case No. 409170, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Júri concede mais de US$ 1,1 milhão a engenheiro com asbestose
A San Francisco jury awarded over $1.1 million to a stationary engineer suffering from asbestosis due to his exposure to asbestos. For 35 years, his job included maintaining laundry equipment. He replaced asbestos–containing binders, pads, and covers––items manufactured by the defendants. ( Asbestos Plaintiff v. American Laundry Machinery, Inc. , 2003, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Brayton Purcell LLP obtém veredictos para clientes contra o Center for Claims Resolution
The Center for Claims Resolution (CCR), a settlement organization comprised of former manufacturers of asbestos products, should not have sent the plaintiffs in asbestos cases checks for amounts that were less than what was agreed to in the original settlements. CCR had claimed that it was not liable for the shortages because they were due to the financial problems of its member companies. ( In re: Complex Asbestos Litigation: Patricia Anderegg, et al. v. Center for Claims Resolution , 2003, Case No. 828684, San Francisco Superior Court, California)Veredicto de lesão automobilística é o maior prêmio por lesão corporal em Utah
A Salt Lake City jury awarded $16.4 million to an 11 1/2 year old boy who suffered a traumatic brain injury that he received in a head–on automobile crash. ( Anthony Gallegos et al. v. Dick Simon Trucking, Inc. , 2001, Utah District Court, Salt Lake City, Utah)O manejo inadequado da dor foi abuso de idosos
In the first successful elder abuse case of its kind, a jury awarded $1.5 million to the family of a deceased man whose doctor had failed to provide him with adequate pain medication in the last days of his terminal cancer. ( Beverly Bergman et al. v. Wing Chin, M.D., Eden Medical Center, 2001, Case No. H205732–1, Alameda Superior Court, California)Engenheiro de cerâmica compensado pela exposição ao berílio
A 37–year old ceramics engineer who was suffering from chronic beryllium disease obtained a $1.9 million jury verdict against the landlord of the facility where he was exposed to beryllium. ( Donald Polensky, et al. v. Kyocera International, 1993, Case No. 63–80–30, Orange County Superior Court, California)Júri retorna veredicto de mais de $ 750.000 por confusão de restos mortais cremados de criança natimorta
Júri retorna veredicto de mais de $ 750.000 por confusão de restos mortais cremados de criança natimorta
An Ohio jury returned a verdict of over $750,000 in favor of a young couple whose stillborn son’s cremated remains were mixed with those of an adult. ( Tonya Leach and Edward Squire v. E.F. Boyd & Son Funeral Home et al. , 2006, Case No. CV 04 546335, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Ohio)Funerária paga indenização por mau uso da cremação
A jury assessed $1 million in total damages, the majority being punitive damages, for the funeral home’s inexplicable loss of the cremated remains of Mrs. Conway’s 90–year old husband. ( May L. Conway v. Gates, Kingsey & Gates, 1992, Case No. WEC 113827, Los Angeles Superior Court, California) Disclaimer: Past results provided on this website do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Results portrayed on this website were dependent on facts of individual cases. Results of your own case will vary depending on the factual and legal circumstances of your situation.
